...
 

Achieving and Maintaining SOC 1 and SOC 2 Compliance with Moodle

Business team reviewing compliance documents on a screen

Organizations that rely on Moodle to deliver learning, assessments, or customer training are increasingly asked an important question by customers, auditors, and enterprise buyers.

Are you SOC 1 or SOC 2 compliant?

As Moodle platforms become more integrated with financial systems, identity providers, and customer data, compliance expectations increase. This article explains what companies should know when considering SOC 1 (Service Organization Control 1) and SOC 2 (Service Organization Control 2) compliance for Moodle, when it is required, what it involves, common challenges, and how expert Moodle support helps reduce risk.

To say that Mindfield Consulting is Planet SHIFT Inc.’s key strategic technology partner is an understatement. They play a pivotal role in helping us delight our clients, providing valuable guidance, forefront thinking, and creative, sustainable solutions — simply – honest and excellent work. As a change agent, I rely on my Mindfield partnership to unlock the possible, and for just under a decade I have never been disappointed. Our clients’ projects range in complexity and criticality, and the credibility of my company’s brand accelerates when Mindfield is included in the assignment. We reinvent businesses together.

 

Eileen Kirk

review Source: Google Reviews

 

Outline

 

 

 

What are SOC 1 and SOC 2?

Achieving and Maintaining SOC 1 and SOC 2 Compliance with Moodle - SOC 1 and SOC 2 shield icons on documents

SOC reports are independent audit reports governed by the AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants). They evaluate how service organizations manage risk and protect systems and data.

SOC 1

SOC 1 focuses on controls over financial reporting.

SOC 1 applies when a Moodle platform:

  • Supports billing or invoicing workflows
  • Tracks learning activity tied to revenue recognition
  • Integrates with accounting or ERP systems
  • Is used by customers subject to financial audits

SOC 2

SOC 2 focuses on operational and data security controls based on Trust Services Criteria.

  • Security
  • Availability
  • Confidentiality
  • Processing Integrity
  • Privacy

SOC 2 is the most common requirement for Moodle platforms delivered as managed or hosted services. This does not mean every Moodle deployment needs SOC 2. It is typically requested when organizations provide Moodle as a hosted service to customers, store sensitive user data, or undergo enterprise vendor security reviews. Internal training platforms used only within one organization usually do not require SOC 2 unless a client, regulator, or contractual agreement specifies it.

When do organizations need SOC compliance for Moodle?

Achieving and Maintaining SOC 1 and SOC 2 Compliance with Moodle - Executives reviewing a compliance checklist

Organizations typically pursue SOC compliance when:

  • Enterprise customers require it during vendor reviews
  • Enterprise security questionnaires become more frequent and time-consuming during procurement reviews, slowing down sales when formal assurance like SOC 2 is not available.
  • The platform serves regulated industries
  • Moodle becomes business critical infrastructure
  • Investor or audit expectations increase

If customers request SOC reports or formal control documentation, SOC readiness becomes necessary.

How SOC 1 and SOC 2 relate to Moodle core by version

Achieving and Maintaining SOC 1 and SOC 2 Compliance with Moodle - Moodle version comparison chart on screen

Moodle itself is not SOC 1 or SOC 2 compliant. SOC compliance applies to how an organization operates, secures, and manages the platform.

Moodle core provides technical capabilities that support SOC controls. These capabilities improve by version.

Moodle Version SOC-Aligned Capabilities in Moodle Core Key Limitations and Considerations
3.9 to 3.11
  • Role-based access control
  • User authentication using SSO or LDAP
  • Audit logs for user and administrator actions
  • Course access and enrollment restrictions
  • Manual backup and restore
  • Limited native security reporting
  • Manual log review and retention
  • Availability monitoring handled outside Moodle
4.0 to 4.2
  • Improved event logging
  • Stronger password and authentication workflows
  • Better separation of administrative roles
  • Improved backup automation options
  • Operational discipline still required
  • Change management processes remain external
  • Evidence collection remains manual
4.3 and later
  • Granular event logging
  • Improved privacy and data management tools
  • Secure web service integrations
  • Better alignment with modern cloud hosting practices
  • Compliance depends on documented processes
  • Hosting and monitoring remain out of scope for Moodle core
  • Audit evidence still requires governance and review

Across all versions, SOC compliance depends on documented processes, monitoring, and evidence collection beyond Moodle core.

Practical technical examples for SOC controls in Moodle

Achieving and Maintaining SOC 1 and SOC 2 Compliance with Moodle - Icons showing access control and system logging

Access Control Example

SOC expectation: Only authorized users have administrative access.

Moodle implementation:

  • Separate roles for administrators and support staff
  • Restrict site administration access
  • Enforce single sign-on with multi-factor authentication

Audit evidence: Role definitions, access lists, access reviews.

Change Management Example

SOC expectation: System changes are approved, tested, and documented.

Moodle implementation:

  • Use staging environments
  • Test updates and plugins before release
  • Document deployment approvals

Audit evidence: Change logs and deployment records.

Logging and Monitoring Example

SOC expectation: Security events are logged and reviewed.

Moodle implementation:

  • Enable standard and legacy logs
  • Define log retention periods
  • Review authentication and admin events

Hosting and shared responsibility in SOC compliance

Achieving and Maintaining SOC 1 and SOC 2 Compliance with Moodle - Layered diagram showing application and hosting roles

SOC audits evaluate the full service delivery model.

Moodle Core

  • User roles and permissions
  • Audit logging
  • Privacy and data controls

Hosting and Infrastructure

  • Infrastructure security
  • Network protection
  • Disaster recovery

Client Organization

  • Access approvals
  • Change governance
  • Incident response

SOC readiness checklist for Moodle

Achieving and Maintaining SOC 1 and SOC 2 Compliance with Moodle - Checklist with completed compliance items

  • Defined audit scope
  • Documented access policies
  • Formal change management
  • Centralized logging
  • Backup and recovery testing
  • Incident response procedures
  • Plugin and vendor risk reviews

How Moodle experts achieve SOC 1 and SOC 2 compliance

Achieving and Maintaining SOC 1 and SOC 2 Compliance with Moodle - Consultant explaining compliance steps to a team

As a provider of Moodle support and development services, we help organizations build audit-ready Moodle platforms.

  • SOC readiness assessments
  • Moodle security reviews
  • Plugin and integration risk analysis
  • Environment hardening
  • Change management governance
  • Audit-aligned documentation
  • Ongoing managed Moodle support

SOC 1 and SOC 2 compliance are increasingly expected for Moodle platforms serving enterprise and regulated customers.

With clear ownership, structured processes, and experienced Moodle support, compliance strengthens trust and supports growth.

If your organization is preparing for SOC compliance or maintaining an existing report, we can help you manage Moodle with confidence.

 

 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Is SOC 1 or SOC 2 a legal requirement for organizations using Moodle?
SOC 1 and SOC 2 are not legal requirements. They are assurance reports requested by customers, partners, investors, and auditors. For executive teams, SOC compliance functions as a trust signal that demonstrates operational maturity, governance discipline, and risk awareness. In many enterprise sales environments, SOC reports are treated as a commercial requirement rather than a regulatory one.
Does achieving SOC compliance increase operational costs?
SOC compliance introduces structured processes, documentation, and monitoring. These activities require time and resources, especially during the first audit cycle. For executives, the long term benefit is improved operational clarity, reduced security incidents, and smoother enterprise sales cycles. Organizations that integrate SOC controls into daily operations avoid repeated remediation costs.
How does SOC compliance affect product development and release speed?
SOC compliance formalizes how changes are approved, tested, and deployed. Development speed remains strong when governance is built into workflows rather than added afterward. Executive leadership benefits from reduced production risk, fewer emergency fixes, and clearer accountability across teams.
Can SOC compliance support international expansion and enterprise growth?
SOC reports are widely recognized across global markets. For executives planning expansion, SOC compliance simplifies vendor due diligence, shortens procurement reviews, and reduces the need for custom security attestations. This consistency supports scalable growth without repeated compliance redesign.
What risks do executives face if SOC compliance is delayed or ignored?
Without SOC alignment, organizations face prolonged sales cycles, increased security scrutiny, and reduced trust from enterprise buyers. Executive risk increases when controls are undocumented or informal, as this limits visibility into operational weaknesses. SOC compliance provides structured insight into system reliability and data protection.
How does SOC compliance improve board and investor confidence?
SOC reports provide independent validation of internal controls and risk management practices. For boards and investors, this validation supports informed oversight and reduces uncertainty related to technology and data governance. SOC compliance demonstrates that leadership prioritizes long term operational resilience.
Is SOC compliance a one time project or an ongoing commitment?
SOC compliance is an ongoing commitment. Controls must operate consistently and evidence must be maintained throughout the year. Executive teams that treat SOC as a continuous program benefit from predictable audits and stable operations rather than recurring disruption.

Request Consultation

    *By submitting you agree to the Mindfield  Terms of Use.

    Mindfield Insights